Build vs. Buy: A SaaS Dilemma



When it comes to making business decisions about whether to build a solution in-house or buy it from an external provider, the discussion often takes on an air of philosophy. A simple analogy that pops up all too frequently is the classic “Would you bake your own baguette or buy it from a bakery?” Let’s be clear: that’s not just unhelpful, it’s absurd when applied to corporate environments. Building a SaaS solution is not a weekend baking project. It’s more like deciding whether to build your own bakery from scratch.

The Allure of Buying: Clear Costs, Quick Setup

At first glance, buying a ready-made solution has undeniable appeal. The costs are neatly itemized: licensing fees, implementation charges, and ongoing subscription payments. You can look at the numbers and confidently plug them into a spreadsheet—et voilà, you have your total cost of ownership (TCO). It’s a polished and straightforward sales pitch: why wrestle with building something internally when you can get up and running almost immediately?

But the story doesn’t end there. Buying a solution may solve a problem today, but its long-term cost-effectiveness depends heavily on two factors: the quality of the “bought” solution and how well it integrates into your current ecosystem. Maintenance, operations, and evolving business needs drive costs in ways that are easy to underestimate. That seamless TCO you calculated? It has a habit of ballooning as time goes on, especially if the purchased solution isn’t designed for scalability or flexibility.

Building Internally: The Hidden Cost Equation

On the flip side, building a solution internally often gets a bad reputation for being prohibitively expensive. Critics point to the need for specialized resources, long development cycles, and high up-front investments. But let’s dig a little deeper.

It’s true that internal projects often come with fuzzy cost estimates. Time spent defining the project scope, navigating uncertainties, and addressing evolving requirements can stretch timelines and budgets. However, if you already have skilled teams working within a complex SaaS platform, building internally is rarely the more expensive option in the long term.

Why? Because the long-term costs of maintenance, iteration, and integration are typically lower for in-house solutions. Your team is already familiar with the intricacies of your platform. They can design with scalability and future needs in mind, avoiding the “technical debt” that can arise from off-the-shelf tools.

Hidden Truths About Outsourcing

When you outsource, you’re not just buying the product; you’re buying into the vendor’s roadmap, priorities, and limitations. Over time, you may find yourself locked into their pace of innovation or constrained by features that don’t fully align with your evolving needs. Add to that the cost of vendor management, integration headaches, and the possibility of needing additional customization work, and the “buy” option begins to look less shiny.

In contrast, building internally allows you to control the roadmap, prioritize features based on your unique business requirements, and respond more nimbly to market changes. When you’ve already invested in an in-house team with platform expertise, outsourcing may not deliver the savings you expect.

The Real Decision: What Are You Optimizing For?

At the heart of the build vs. buy debate lies a fundamental question: what is your organization optimizing for? If speed-to-market is the top priority and the need is relatively generic, buying a solution might make sense. But if you’re working within a complex platform and aiming for long-term efficiency, scalability, and alignment with your business’s unique needs, building internally is likely the better choice.

In today’s SaaS landscape, where maintenance and operations drive costs more than initial development, the upfront effort to build in-house can pay dividends over time. By leveraging your existing team’s expertise and aligning development efforts with your strategic goals, you can achieve a solution that fits like a tailored suit—without the surprises lurking in off-the-shelf options.

So, no, we’re not baking baguettes here. We’re designing bakeries that can churn out the perfect loaf every time, meet unexpected demand, and keep running efficiently for years to come. Choose wisely.

Comentarios